|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern
Project
Leaders:
Asha Von Ruden (Science) and Bill Gillooly (Social Studies)
Consultants/Coordinators: Dale Abrams and Jane Burke
Housatonic
River Restoration, Inc.

Southern
Background:
Over the past decade, a number of teacher-initiated
projects at Southern Berkshire Regional School District (SBRSD) have developed
into a multifaceted environmental studies program. With the support of
Housatonic River Restoration (HRR), Massachusetts Cultural Council, and other
funders,
Beginning in 2002, the K-12 was guided by a steering committee composed of SBRSD teachers and administrators and a diverse assemblage of staff from local conservation organizations. Charged with guiding the development of the district’s environmental education efforts, the committee has charted an ambitious plan to expand existing programs through professional development, curriculum review/revision, and partnerships with local conservation organizations.
The committee specifically recommended that the district focus on developing a model program at each school level (elementary, middle, and high school) that will expand over time to encompass multiple grades/classes and will build curricular bridges between the schools. The committee also recommended that the school develop opportunities for student involvement in environmental stewardship projects on school grounds and in the community. The middle school’s Housatonic River Unit serves as an excellent model from which to build similar units for the elementary and high school level.
This report provides an overview and full curriculum
documentation of the interdisciplinary Housatonic River Unit developed through
HRR’s Housatonic River Curriculum Project. The report contains a unit summary
and timeline, as well as lesson plans and associated materials, final project
and presentation assignments, and evaluation rubrics and other assessment
tools. It also includes descriptions of the service learning projects and two
evaluation meetings. Samples of student
work (e.g. journal entries, essays, projects) and supporting photos and videos
are provided as well.
Project Overview:
During an environmental education planning session in
April 2002, four
Over the course of several daylong work sessions and shorter meetings this past summer and early fall, the 8th grade team (eight subject area teachers representing social studies, science, language arts, and math, and one special education teacher) revised and expanded a pre-existing Housatonic River Unit. Project coordinator, Dale Abrams, provided facilitation and guidance during the planning sessions and logistical support for coordinating field trips and service learning projects. The 8th grade teachers planned and designed an array of new classroom and field learning experiences, journal assignments, and interdisciplinary projects and presentations. This advance planning substantially improved the scope and depth of the unit. The teachers redefined the purpose of the unit, improved the framework alignment, added a service-learning component, and developed a number of new assessment tools.
The result is a new unit spanning roughly four weeks during
September and October, during which social studies, language arts, and science
teachers dedicate a large portion of their class time to the
During September and October, eighty students and teachers
participated in a multi-layered river study. Social studies, language arts, and
science teachers dedicated a large portion of this time to
All 8th grade students received an auditorium presentation led by the social studies and language arts teachers one week ahead of the field-learning component. This lesson provided an introduction to the Housatonic River Unit emphasizing the concept of viewing the river through the eyes of colonial settlers. Using visuals and narrative, the teachers described the river during the colonial period and discussed how the river has changed over time. The objective of the unit, as presented in this introduction, is for students to develop an intimate understanding of the river while striving to see through the eyes of a settler, scientist, writer, and historian, all while becoming good caretakers of the river for the future.
Early lessons in science, social studies, and math classes,
introduced the journal component and provided preparation for the canoeing day
and Bartholomew’s Cobble field trip. Students spent one class session in
advance of the field trip learning about the
A desire to add a substantial language arts component to the unit contributed to an important decision to build student journals into the new curriculum. Journals became a key element of the unit redesign, providing a means to gauge prior knowledge, monitor interest, evaluate learning, and guide development of the unit. Given the logistical challenge of organizing and transporting nearly 80 students for field trips, journals provided a positive way to extend the learning experience well beyond the field learning days. The canoe day, the Cobble field learning stations, most classroom lessons, and the project and presentation were all accompanied by specific journal prompts (brief writing assignments connected to the day’s activities that were due the following day). The students completed six journal entries, a persuasive essay, a major group project, and prepared and delivered an interdisciplinary presentation for peers and elementary level students. Their journal entries provided important feedback regarding unit design and sequencing that would help in restructuring the unit next year.
Earlier versions of the Housatonic River Unit had included a
canoe trip as the culminating activity for the unit. In the redesigned unit,
all 8th grade students participated in a half-day
Housatonic River Canoe Days —The primary goal was to provide a
positive river experience to overcome the common perception that the river is
dirty and not worth visiting. Forty students per day participated in canoeing
roughly three miles out and back on the
Bartholomew’s Cobble Field Study Days — Forty students per day
participated in an interdisciplinary field study at Bartholomew’s Cobble in
Living History: Ann Elizabeth
Barnes, who works as a tour guide for Trustees of Reservations and
Soil and Ecosystems: Mary Edwards, a Mount Everett Middle School team member and science teacher, provided students with an overview of the main forest ecosystems found at the Cobble (and the Housatonic watershed). During the field trip, students collected and analyzed soil core samples from three sites to compare soils associated with three representative ecosystems (i.e. old growth hemlock forest, deciduous bottomland forest, and red cedar forest), as well as soil temperatures and qualitative descriptions for each site.
Water Quality: Asha Von Ruden,
project leader and
Art and Math in Nature: Peggy
Reeves, a
Group Project and Presentation Component
Another key component of the new
Service Learning Component
Following the steering committee’s recommendation, service learning has recently become an integral part of the district’s environmental education initiative. Research has shown that this work elicits a deeper involvement from students and enables them to gain a richer understanding of academic concepts. Thus far, K-12 service projects include trail construction, water quality monitoring, and invasive plant control. Projects such as these add authenticity to the academic experience by connecting the curriculum to current community conservation efforts.
The Housatonic River Unit provided two opportunities for students to benefit from service learning and make lasting connections with area conservation organizations. This unit brings teachers and students together with staff from Flying Cloud Institute, Sheffield Land Trust, and The Trustees of Reservations, providing hands-on learning experiences that tap the expertise of these community organizations. Such partnerships are critical at a time when schools are facing unprecedented budget shortfalls. The two middle school projects completed this year are described below and in the lesson plans for these activities.
Bear’s Den Property — Topographical Survey and Mapping – Forty
students participated in a project initiated by the Sheffield Land Trust (SLT).
SLT requested the middle school’s assistance with surveying a parcel of land
adjacent to the school that is proposed for conservation. Either SBRSD or the
Town of
Bartholomew’s Cobble — Invasive Plant Monitoring and Control – Forty students participated in a project initiated by The Trustees of Reservations (TTOR). TTOR requested the middle school’s assistance with mapping and controlling introduced invasive plants at Bartholomew’s Cobble preserve. TTOR needed assistance with measuring the size and density of a stand of fragmites (a tall reed-like grass). This information will provide a baseline from which to monitor the spread of this species and determine whether control measures are needed. Project coordinator Dale Abrams developed a protocol for roughly mapping the plants’ current distribution and density. TTOR also requested assistance with ongoing efforts to control multiflora rose, European barberry, and purple loosestrife. Students learned techniques for clipping flower heads, cutting plants, and digging out roots. Students loaded plants into a pick-up truck for removal. Twenty students per day participated in this project.

George demonstrates
hypsometer (to measure slope) at Bear's Den.
Documentation/Presentation:
During the summer planning
workshop, the 8th grade team mapped out the overall sequence and
content of the new Housatonic River Unit. The team spelled out the overall purpose
and goals, specific standards and learning objectives, a sequence of lessons
and activities, and a process for evaluating student work and the unit as a
whole. The team divided up the planning and documentation of the lessons and
related materials based on academic disciplines. Each pair of subject area
teachers took responsibility for documenting all lessons that fell
predominantly within their domain. The teachers frequently consulted with each
other regarding content and standards due to the interdisciplinary nature of
the unit. As a whole, the team spent more than forty hours on documentation.
The amount of time required for this phase was significantly underestimated.
This report and all other
Public exhibition of the project has progressed more slowly than anticipated due to the time involved in completing the documentation. The project coordinator found an initial forum for sharing the unit via a SBRSD professional development series. From February through May the project coordinator led a bi-weekly science professional development series. The Housatonic River Unit was highlighted throughout as a model environmental education curriculum with a strong community outreach component.
The culmination of the
Housatonic curriculum project for SBRSD is scheduled well after the completion
of the actual
Evaluation:
The evaluation plan for the middle school project involved participant evaluations following the summer institute, and mid-term and final evaluations during and following the implementation of the Housatonic River Unit. Separate evaluation questions were used for the summer institute, field and service learning component, and final unit evaluation respectively. A brief summary of the evaluation results is provided below. Complete details are provided in the evaluation meeting minutes (see below).
The team came together once during and once following the unit to evaluate progress and to document ideas for improving the project next year. Overall, the team thought the unit represented a significant improvement over past efforts. The main suggestions were to increase the length of the unit and front load the experience with more social studies and science content (i.e. prior to the outdoor learning) so that the field experiences have a clearer context. The team also agreed that the quality of student projects could be improved and that the best ways to address this are to provide high quality examples, to provide more in-class work time with multiple drafts/revisions, and to give feedback along the way. The idea of somehow dividing the field-learning day into two days was also explored. Please refer to the evaluation questions and meeting minutes, which are included following the lesson plans, for full details. The evaluation of the canoeing and field-learning components is documented in the accompanying spread sheet/matrix.
Future Plans:
The primary goal of this project was to expand and improve an existing 1-2 week social studies and science unit. This year, the 8th grade team successfully designed and implemented a highly interdisciplinary four-week Housatonic River Unit. The new curriculum has been fully documented by the teachers and coordinator for in-house use and for dissemination to other schools. The team will meet again this summer to further revise the project.
Our goals for the coming year include extending the 8th grade Housatonic River Unit to six weeks, broadening the scope to better encompass the watershed, and expanding the service-learning component with additional water-related projects. These curriculum planning and revision necessary to accomplish these goals will be completed during a series of three planning workshops during July and August 2003, facilitated by FCI staff. Using data from two evaluation meetings held this year, the team will work to improve curricular content, project assignments, and assessment tools, in ways that support students in producing high quality projects and products. Staff from area conservation organizations will be brought in to assist with refining the service-learning component and developing new community projects. Every effort will be made to build authenticity into the service-learning experiences by connecting the curriculum to current community conservation efforts. All curricula will continue to be documented, evaluated, revised, and improved.